Preview
FILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2019 10:15 AM INDEX NO. E2019003105 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2019 MONROE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE THIS IS NOT A BILL. THIS IS YOUR RECEIPT. Receipt # 2033757 Book Page CIVIL Return To: No. Pages: 4 DAVID BARRY WARSHAW ¹=±rent: EFILING INDEX NUMBER Control #: 201904040197 Index #: E2019003105 Date: 04/04/2019 MIDLAND FUNDING LLC Time: 8:26:33 AM GARRETT, JERROD State Fee Index Number $165.00 County Fee Index Number $26.00 State Fee Cultural Education $14.25 State Fee Records $4.75 Employee: JM Management Total Fees Paid: $210.00 State of New York MONROE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE WARNING - THIS SHEET CONSTITUTES THE CLERKS ENDORsem*nT, REQUIRED BY SECTION 317-a(5) & SECTION 319 OF THE REAL PROPERTY LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. DO NOT DETACH OR REMOVE. ADAM J BELLO MONROE COUNTY CLERK 1 of 4 201304G40197 04/04/2019 08:26:33 AM CI 201904040197 INDEX NO. E2019003105 FILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2019 10:15 AM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2019 File # G203007 CONSUMER CREDIT. TRANSACTION SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF MONROE _________________________________ MIDLAND FUNDING LLC Plaintiff, Index No. -against- SUMMONS JERROD GARRETT Plaintiff's Residence Address 2365 NORTHSIDE DR STE 300 SAN DIEGO CA 92108 Defendant(s). The Basis of this venue designated is : Defendant's residence ____________________ -_____ Defendant's Residence Address.: 616 .WEBSTER RD WEBSTER, NY 145809.502 YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the complaint in this action and to serve a copy of your answer, or, if the complaint is. not served with this summons, to s.erve a notice of appearance on the plaintiff's attorney within twenty (20) days after the service of this summons exclusive of the days of service (or within thirty (30) days after the service is complete if this summons is not personally delivered to you within the State o.f New York). You are hereby notified that should you fail to appear or answer, judgment will be taken -against you by default for the relief demanded. in the complaint.. Dated: 03/25/19 PRESSLER, FELT & WARSHAW, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff 305· Br th Floo.r way New Y rk, NY 1 007 (516 222-7929 (x] y: Cra S .er , Es .. Ian Z. W David B. Warshak-Esq. 2 of 4 201904040197 04/04/2019 08:26:33 AM CI 201904040197 INDEX NO. E2019003105 FILED: b MONROE COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2019 10:15 AM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2019 File # G203007 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - COUNTY OF MONROE __________________________________ MIDLAND FUNDING LLC Plaintiff(s) Index No. -against- COMPLAINT JERROD GARRETT Defendant.(..S.). __________________________________ Plaintiff by its attorney, Pressler, Felt & Warshaw, LLP complaining of the defendant(s) alleges upon information and belief as follows: FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 1. Plaintiff, MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, is a limited liability company formed under the laws of the state of Delaware and having taken assignment of is owner of CREDIT ONE BANK, N.A. account number eriding in XXXXXXXXXXXXSO24 . 2. .JERROD GARRETT resides within the jurisdictional limits of this court. 3. Plaintiff alleges that JERROD GARRETT is the resp.onsible person for this account. 4. JERROD GARRETT failed to repay the balance owed on the account, which is in default. 5. The account was assigned from the original creditor CREDIT ONE BANK, N..·A. to MHC RECEIVABLES, LLC, and then to SHERMAN ORIGINATOR III LLC and then to MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, the present assignee.. 6. The cause of action asserted herein accrued on or about June 24, 2.017, the governing law being the state of Nevada.. 7. The date of last payment is on or about June 24, 2017. 8. Upon information and belief, the statute of fimitations for the cause of action asserted herein is 4 years and therefore has not expired. 9. There is now .due and owing the. plaintiff, as the assignee of the account, from JERROD GARRETT , the sum of S1,171.61. 3 of 4 201904040197 04/04/2019 08:26:33 AM CI 201904040197 INDEX NO. E2019003105 FILED:. MONROE COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2019 10:15 AM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2019 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against JERROD GARRETT fo.r the sum of $1,171.61 plus costs and disbursem*nts of this action and for such further and other relief as the Court deems just and proper. Dated: 0.3/25/T9. PRESSLER, FELT & WARSHAW, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff 305 Broadway 9th Floor New York, 0007 (516)2 -7929 [X] . : Craig Sti r , sq. Z. Wino sq. [ ] By: David B. Warshaw Esq. THIS COMMUNICATION IS FROM A. DEBT COLLECTORr THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO COLLECT A DEBT. ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPUSE. 4 of 4
Related Contentin Monroe County
Case
Bank Of America, N.A. v. Geoffrey M Thompson
May 21, 2021 |James Vazzana |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff |E2021004513
Case
Esl Federal Credit Union v. Michelle Y Rogers
Aug 16, 2024 |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Non-Card) Transaction |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Non-Card) Transaction |E2024013983
Case
Credit Acceptance Corporation v. Abimahel Ayala Almestica
Aug 20, 2024 |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Non-Card) Transaction |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Non-Card) Transaction |E2024014100
Case
Discover Bank v. Samuel Luna
Aug 21, 2024 |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff |E2024014156
Case
Discover Bank v. Deanna Arnold
Aug 04, 2023 |Kevin M. Nasca |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff |E2023008764
Case
Alternative Lending Holdings Trust Ii, Serviced By Upgrade, Inc v. Dawn Francisco
Aug 12, 2024 |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Non-Card) Transaction |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Non-Card) Transaction |E2024013636
Case
Lvnv Funding Llc v. David Aikens
Aug 21, 2024 |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Debt Buyer Plaintiff |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Debt Buyer Plaintiff |E2024014163
Case
Esl Federal Credit Union v. Dawn Elizabeth Williams
Aug 17, 2024 |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Non-Card) Transaction |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Non-Card) Transaction |E2024013993
Case
Credit Corp Solutions Inc v. Latasha Nugent
Aug 21, 2024 |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Debt Buyer Plaintiff |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Debt Buyer Plaintiff |E2024014220
Ruling
Synchrony Bank vs. Henig
Aug 21, 2024 |23CVG-00319
SYNCHRONY BANK VS. HENIGCase Number: 23CVG-00319This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of settlement and/or dismissal. The Court notes that Noticeof Conditional Settlement was filed on October 10, 2023. Due to the conditional settlement, the Court deems thismatter exempt from case disposition time standards. The Court sets this matter for a Review Hearing on June 9,2025. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.
Ruling
DISCOVER BANK vs ORTIZ
Aug 25, 2024 |Frank Anthony Moschetti |CVCO2105975
MOTION TO BE RELIEVED ASCVCO2105975 DISCOVER BANK VS ORTIZCOUNSEL FOR DISCOVER BANKTentative Ruling: After review of Defense Counsel’s Motion to be Relieved, the Courtfinds sufficient cause has been presented for counsel’s request. Request to be relievedas counsel for Defendant is GRANTED. This order will be effective upon the filing of theproof of service of the court’s signed order relieving counsel.
Ruling
- WELLS FARGO BANK NA vs ZAMORA, FRANKIE R
Aug 23, 2024 |CV-22-005672
CV-22-005672 - WELLS FARGO BANK NA vs ZAMORA, FRANKIE R - Plaintiff's Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions Admitted and of Nonappearance - GRANTED, and unopposed.The Court finds that Defendant has failed to respond to the subject discovery entirely and objections have been waived. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2033.280(a).) Accordingly, the Court has no discretion but to grant Plaintiff’s request. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2033.280(c); St. Mary’s v. Superior Court (Schellenberg) (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 762, 777-778.). The matters contained in Request for Admissions, Set One, are deemed admitted.The Court will sign the proposed order submitted by Plaintiff.
Ruling
Discover Bank vs. Hagler-Mabry
Aug 22, 2024 |24CVG-00462
DISCOVER BANK VS. HAGLER-MABRYCase Number: 24CVG-00462Tentative Ruling on Motion to Quash Service of Summons: Defendant Deborah Hagler-Mabrymoves to quash service of summons pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 418.10 on thegrounds of improper service. Defendant argues that personal service was improper, because theprocess server “tossed” the summons and complaint on the porch outside of Defendant’s home.Plaintiff opposes the Motion, arguing that the process server’s return establishes a rebuttablepresumption of the facts stated in the return, pursuant to California Evidence Code section 647.Plaintiff has filed a verified return establishing a rebuttable presumption that Defendant waspersonally served on June 13, 2024. Defendant has not offered any admissible evidence to rebutthe presumption.Merits: “When a defendant challenges the court's personal jurisdiction on the ground of improperservice of process the burden is on the plaintiff to prove … the facts requisite to an effectiveservice.” Summers v. McClanahan (2006) 140 CA4th 403, 413, (internal quotes omitted); seeLebel v. Mai (2012) 210 CA4th 1154, 1163. Delivering copies of the summons and complaint todefendant personally constitutes “personal service” of summons. CCP § 415.10. As long as theprocess server identifies himself or herself and tells the reluctant defendant that he or she is beingserved with process and leaves the papers as close as possible to the defendant, service is validnotwithstanding the defendant's refusal to accept. Trujillo v. Trujillo (1945) 71 CA2d 257, 260.California Evidence Code section 647 provides that the return of a process server registeredpursuant to Chapter 16 (commencing with Section 22350) of Division 8 of the Business andProfessions Code upon process or notice establishes a presumption, affecting the burden ofproducing evidence, of the facts stated in the return.Here, Plaintiff has provided a verified Proof of Service from a registered process server thatestablishes personal service of Defendant. The Summons and Complaint were delivered toDefendant at her home address on June 13, 2024. Defendant confirmed her identity to the processserver by nodding when named. Defendant tried to refuse service by closing the door. Thedocuments were left and seen by the Defendant. This constitutes valid personal service. Defendanthas failed to offer any admissible evidence to rebut the presumption of the facts stated in theprocess server’s return as required by Evidence Code section 647. Service is valid and the Motionto Quash is DENIED. No proposed order has been lodged as required by Local Rule 5.17(D).Defendant shall prepare the order.
Ruling
Creditors Adjustment Bureau, INC. vs. Factory OS, INC. et al
Aug 21, 2024 |CU23-05770
CU23-05770Motion to set aside defaultTENTATIVE RULINGThe Parties are to appear.
Ruling
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. vs PINEDA
Aug 22, 2024 |CVMV2301473
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. MOTION TO LIFT THE NOTICE OFCVMV2301473vs PINEDA CONDITIONAL SETTLEMENT STAYTentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. Appearance is required.
Ruling
WIS IVS, LLC FKA RGIS, LLC VS. JANIE AND JACK LLC ET AL
Aug 22, 2024 |CGC24611357
Matter on the Law and Motion calendar for Thursday, August 22, 2024, Line 12. DEFENDANT JANIE AND JACK LLC's MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE. David Simon's unopposed pro hac vice application is granted. For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RBU)
Ruling
Aspire General Insurance Company vs. Allison
Aug 21, 2024 |22CVG-00899
ASPIRE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY VS. ALLISONCase Number: 22CVG-00899This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of the case. The Court notes that Plaintiff has still not fileda Proof of Service of Summons. Monetary sanctions have already been imposed. The Court will issue an Orderto Show Cause Re: Dismissal for failure to timely serve and failure to timely prosecute. Hearing on the Order toShow Cause will be on Monday, November 4, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 63. The clerk is directed toprepare an Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal. The matter will also be calendared on Monday, November 4,2024 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 63 for review regarding status of service. No appearance is necessary ontoday’s calendar.
Document
Credit Corp Solutions Inc v. Konjet Gebrehiwot, Tewodros Tella
Feb 12, 2024 |James Vazzana |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Debt Buyer Plaintiff |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Debt Buyer Plaintiff |E2024002819
Document
Lvnv Funding Llc v. Damaris Montero
Aug 19, 2024 |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Debt Buyer Plaintiff |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Debt Buyer Plaintiff |E2024014084
Document
Discover Bank v. Susan J Bruns
Sep 30, 2021 |James Vazzana |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff |E2021008961
Document
Credit Acceptance Corporation v. Alvin Lozada-Gomez
Aug 20, 2024 |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Non-Card) Transaction |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Non-Card) Transaction |E2024014095
Document
Family First Of Ny Federal Credit Union v. Damon L Williams
Aug 16, 2024 |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Non-Card) Transaction |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Non-Card) Transaction |E2024013982
Document
Bank Of America, N.A. v. Geoffrey M Thompson
May 21, 2021 |James Vazzana |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff |E2021004513
Document
Apr 09, 2024 |Daniel J. Doyle |Commercial - Other (Lien Foreclosure) |Commercial Division |E2024006083
Document
Td Bank Usa, N.A. v. Linda Kucharski
Aug 28, 2023 |Joseph D. Waldorf |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff |Other Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff |E2023009692
